Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
2006 ›
MP ›
MP3 PATENTS LICENSED BY SISVEL AUDIO MPEG
Trademark search for:
MP3 PATENTS LICENSED BY SISVEL AUDIO MPEG
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-10-20 — Application filed
2007-03-29 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2007-03-30 — Application filed
2007-03-30 — Assigned to examiner
2007-04-18 — Final disposition recorded
2007-04-19 — Office action issued
2007-04-22 — Office action issued
2007-04-22 — Office action issued
2007-05-10 — Office action issued
2007-11-20 — Application abandoned
2007-11-20 — Application abandoned
2007-12-27 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-12-27 — Office action issued
2007-12-27 — Petition to revive-granted
2007-12-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-12-27 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-12-27 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-01-10 — Final disposition recorded
2008-01-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-01-10 — Final disposition recorded
2008-01-10 — Final disposition recorded
2008-01-23 — Attorney review completed
2008-02-08 — Office action issued
2008-06-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-06-16 — Office action issued
2008-06-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-07-11 — Office action issued
2008-07-11 — Office action issued
2008-07-11 — Office action issued
2008-09-04 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2008-09-04 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2008-09-19 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2009-01-09 — Paper received
2009-01-15 — Assigned to lie
2009-01-16 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2009-01-16 — Amendment from applicant entered
2009-01-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-01-21 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2009-01-21 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2009-02-11 — Examiners amendment -written
2009-02-11 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-02-11 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-02-12 — Final disposition recorded
2009-02-12 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2009-02-12 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2009-02-12 — Examiner's amendment entered
2009-05-12 — Assigned to examiner
2009-08-31 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2009-09-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-09-04 — Law office publication review completed
2009-10-13 — Published for opposition
2009-10-13 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2009-12-29 — Registered-principal register
2010-01-05 — Paper received
2010-01-25 — Paper received
2010-03-29 — Final disposition recorded
2010-04-19 — Final disposition recorded
2010-04-19 — Final disposition recorded
2013-02-05 — Final disposition recorded
2015-02-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-08-05 — Cancelled section 71
2016-10-20 — Final status recorded
2017-04-05 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2017-04-06 — Generic madrid transaction sent to ib
2017-04-06 — Generic madrid transaction created
2017-05-19 — Death of international registration
2017-05-19 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
2017-05-26 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
Owner Information
S.I.SV.EL.; Società Italiana per lo Sviluppo; dell'Elettronica S.p.A.
IT
S.I.SV.EL.; Società Italiana per lo Sviluppo; dell'Elettronica S.p.A.
IT
S.I.SV.EL.; Società Italiana per lo Sviluppo; dell'Elettronica S.p.A.
IT
Correspondent
ROBERTA S. BREN Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P. 1940 Duke Street Alexandria, VA 22314 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-10-20
Status Date:
2016-10-20
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.