Trademark search for:

RUESCHLINK

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2007-02-23 — Application filed
2007-02-28 — Application filed
2007-03-15 — Paper received
2007-03-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-04-18 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
2007-04-18 — Assigned to lie
2007-06-09 — Assigned to examiner
2007-06-21 — Final disposition recorded
2007-06-21 — Final disposition recorded
2007-06-21 — Final disposition recorded
2007-12-07 — Paper received
2008-01-17 — Amendment from applicant entered
2008-01-17 — Amendment from applicant entered
2008-01-17 — Assigned to lie
2008-01-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-03-31 — Office action issued
2008-03-31 — Office action issued
2008-03-31 — Office action issued
2008-09-26 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2008-09-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-09-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-10-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-11-03 — Law office publication review completed
2008-11-19 — Notice of publication
2008-12-09 — Published for opposition
2009-03-03 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-10-05 — Application abandoned
2009-10-05 — Application abandoned
2009-10-05 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Ruesch Holding, Inc.
Washington , DC

Ruesch Holding, Inc.
Washington , DC

Correspondent

JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, AND NEUSTADT, P.
1940 DUKE ST
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-02-23

Status Date:
2009-10-05

Category:
Telecommunications

Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.