Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
2008 ›
MO ›
MONKIFU
Trademark search for:
MONKIFU
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-08-19 — Application filed
2008-08-22 — Application filed
2008-08-26 — Teas amendment entered before attorney assigned
2008-08-26 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2008-11-28 — Assigned to examiner
2008-12-03 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-03 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-03 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-09 — Office action issued
2009-03-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-03-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-04-03 — Office action issued
2009-04-03 — Office action issued
2009-04-03 — Office action issued
2009-11-02 — Examiners amendment -written
2009-11-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-11-02 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-11-02 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-11-02 — Examiner's amendment entered
2009-11-18 — Assigned to lie
2009-11-18 — Law office publication review completed
2009-12-22 — Published for opposition
2009-12-22 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-03-16 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-10-18 — Application abandoned
2010-10-18 — Application abandoned
2010-10-18 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
BlastMsgs Inc.
San Diego , CA
BlastMsgs Inc.
San Diego , CA
Correspondent
MICHELLE L. MEHOK, ESQ. PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN, LLP 12255 EL CAMINO REAL STE 300 SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-4088 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-08-19
Status Date:
2010-10-18
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.