Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
2008 ›
OS ›
OSHOPPING
Trademark search for:
OSHOPPING
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-11-26 — Application filed
2008-12-01 — Application filed
2008-12-02 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-02-25 — Assigned to examiner
2009-02-26 — Final disposition recorded
2009-02-26 — Final disposition recorded
2009-02-26 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-06-09 — Office action issued
2009-06-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-06-17 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-17 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-17 — Final disposition recorded
2009-07-01 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2009-12-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-12-10 — Office action issued
2009-12-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-12-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-12-30 — Assigned to lie
2009-12-30 — Law office publication review completed
2010-02-02 — Published for opposition
2010-02-02 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-04-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-11-29 — Application abandoned
2010-11-29 — Application abandoned
2010-11-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
CJ O SHOPPING CO., LTD.
SEOUL KR
CJ O SHOPPING CO., LTD.
SEOUL KR
CJ HOME SHOPPING CO., LTD.
Seoul KR
Correspondent
MARK J. LISS LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD. TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N. STETSON AVE SUITE 4900 CHICAGO, IL 60601-6731
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-11-26
Status Date:
2010-11-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.