Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
2008 ›
PR ›
PRAYZTEL
Trademark search for:
PRAYZTEL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-05-19 — Application filed
2008-05-22 — Application filed
2008-05-23 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-09-03 — Assigned to examiner
2008-09-11 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-11 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-11 — Final disposition recorded
2008-11-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-11-20 — Office action issued
2008-12-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-12-04 — Assigned to lie
2008-12-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-12-05 — Examiners amendment -written
2008-12-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-12-05 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-12-05 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-12-05 — Examiner's amendment entered
2008-12-08 — Law office publication review completed
2008-12-24 — Notice of publication
2009-01-13 — Published for opposition
2009-04-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-08-12 — Sou teas extension received
2009-08-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
2009-09-09 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-09-09 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-05-10 — Application abandoned
2010-05-10 — Application abandoned
2010-05-10 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
PRAYZTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Hollywood , FL
PRAYZTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Hollywood , FL
Correspondent
Karl M. Zielaznicki, Esq. Troutman Sanders LLP 600 Peachtree St., NE, STE 5200 c/o TM DKT CLK Atlanta, GA 30308-2216
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-05-19
Status Date:
2010-05-10
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.