Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
2008 ›
QU ›
QUALIFIED PARTNER T
Trademark search for:
QUALIFIED PARTNER T
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-03-06 — Application filed
2008-03-11 — Application filed
2008-03-12 — Notice of design search code mailed
2008-03-28 — Assigned to examiner
2008-04-04 — Final disposition recorded
2008-04-04 — Final disposition recorded
2008-04-04 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-29 — Office action issued
2008-10-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-10-14 — Assigned to lie
2008-10-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-10-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-10-17 — Law office publication review completed
2008-11-05 — Notice of publication
2008-11-25 — Published for opposition
2009-02-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-02-27 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2009-02-27 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2009-03-03 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-03-03 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2009-04-07 — Registered-principal register
2015-10-05 — Request for sect 7 total surrender filed
2015-10-05 — Teas section 7 surrender received
2015-10-07 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2015-10-14 — Cancelled section 7-total
2015-10-14 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Deutsche Telekom
Bonn DE
Deutsche Telekom
Bonn DE
Deutsche Telekom
Bonn DE
Correspondent
MICHAEL D. ADAMS MAYER BROWN LLP PO BOX 2828 CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-03-06
Status Date:
2015-10-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.