Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
2008 ›
SP ›
SPEEDVISION HD
Trademark search for:
SPEEDVISION HD
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-05-15 — Application filed
2008-05-19 — Application filed
2008-05-20 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-08-29 — Assigned to examiner
2008-09-02 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-02 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-02 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-22 — Office action issued
2008-09-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-09-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-10-10 — Examiners amendment -written
2008-10-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-10-10 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-10-10 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-10-10 — Examiner's amendment entered
2008-10-23 — Assigned to lie
2008-10-23 — Law office publication review completed
2008-11-05 — Notice of publication
2008-11-25 — Published for opposition
2008-12-23 — Extension of time to oppose received
2009-03-25 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2010-05-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
2011-06-22 — Application abandoned
2011-06-22 — Application abandoned
2011-06-22 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2011-06-22 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2011-06-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Phoenix 2008 LLC
New Canaan , CT
Phoenix 2008 LLC
New Canaan , CT
Correspondent
Brian J. Hurh Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 1919 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Suite 800 Washington, DC 20006-3401
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-05-15
Status Date:
2011-06-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.