Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
2009 ›
SC ›
SCOPESHARE
Trademark search for:
SCOPESHARE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-10-01 — Application filed
2009-10-05 — Application filed
2009-10-13 — Application filed
2009-10-14 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-12-29 — Assigned to examiner
2010-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
2010-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
2010-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
2010-01-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-01-16 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2010-06-29 — Office action issued
2010-07-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-07-14 — Assigned to lie
2010-07-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-07-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-07-29 — Law office publication review completed
2010-08-31 — Published for opposition
2010-08-31 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-10-26 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-04-20 — Sou teas extension received
2011-04-20 — Sou extension 1 filed
2011-04-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
2011-04-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-11-28 — Application abandoned
2011-11-28 — Application abandoned
2011-11-28 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.
Tucson , AZ
Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.
Tucson , AZ
Correspondent
Glenn Spencer Bacal Bacal Law Group PC 6991 East Camelback Road, Suite D-102 Scottsdale, AZ 85251 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-10-01
Status Date:
2011-11-28
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.