Brandinium

Trademark search for:

WORLDCOMMUTE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-09-11 — Application filed
  • 2009-09-15 — Application filed
  • 2009-09-15 — Application filed
  • 2009-09-16 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2009-09-29 — Teas amendment entered before attorney assigned
  • 2009-09-29 — Teas amendment entered before attorney assigned
  • 2009-09-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-09-29 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2009-09-29 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2009-12-11 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-12-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-12-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-04-26 — Paper received
  • 2010-05-18 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2010-05-18 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-05-18 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-06-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-06-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-09-21 — Use amendment filed
  • 2010-09-21 — Paper received
  • 2010-09-22 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2010-09-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-09-23 — Amendment to use processing complete
  • 2010-09-23 — Use amendment accepted
  • 2010-09-24 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use mailed
  • 2010-09-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-10-04 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-10-18 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2010-10-20 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2010-10-20 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2010-10-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-10-20 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2010-10-20 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2010-10-23 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-11-10 — Notice of publication
  • 2010-11-30 — Published for opposition
  • 2011-01-25 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2011-05-26 — Paper received
  • 2011-05-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2011-06-01 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-06-01 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2011-06-02 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2012-01-06 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-01-06 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2012-01-12 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2012-01-13 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2012-05-29 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-05-29 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2012-05-31 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2012-06-01 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2013-01-17 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2013-01-17 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2013-01-29 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2013-01-30 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2013-07-17 — Teas petition to amend basis received
  • 2013-07-18 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2013-07-25 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2013-07-25 — 44(e) petition - dismissed
  • 2013-07-25 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2013-09-03 — Registered-principal register
  • 2015-03-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-03-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2017-08-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-09-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2020-06-05 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2020-06-05 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

CATEYE CO., LTD.
Osaka-shi, Osaka JP
CATEYE CO., LTD.
Osaka-shi, Osaka JP
CATEYE CO., LTD.
Osaka-shi, Osaka JP

Correspondent

Joseph Ming Kuo Arnstein & Lehr LLP
161 North Clark Street
Suite 4200
Chicago, IL 60606

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-09-11
Status Date:
2020-06-05
Category:
Telecommunications
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.