Brandinium

Trademark search for:

MIR3 INTELLIGENT NOTIFICATION

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2010-02-16 — Application filed
  • 2010-02-19 — Application filed
  • 2010-02-19 — Application filed
  • 2010-02-20 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2010-05-19 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-05-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-05-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-05-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-07-02 — Office action issued
  • 2010-07-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-07-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-07-25 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-07-25 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-07-25 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-01-25 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-02-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2011-06-10 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2011-06-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-06-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-07-07 — Office action issued
  • 2011-07-07 — Office action issued
  • 2011-07-07 — Office action issued
  • 2011-07-07 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2011-07-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-07-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-07-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-07-22 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-08-05 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2011-08-19 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2011-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-19 — Office action issued
  • 2011-09-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-09-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-09-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-09-27 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-11-01 — Published for opposition
  • 2011-11-01 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2012-01-17 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-09-21 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2017-01-17 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2017-02-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2017-02-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-06-21 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2018-01-15 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2018-01-31 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2018-02-07 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2018-02-09 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
  • 2018-02-21 — Office action issued
  • 2018-02-28 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - mailed
  • 2018-02-28 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2020-08-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-08-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-08-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-08-28 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-08-28 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-01-17 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2022-07-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2022-07-29 — Final status recorded
  • 2025-04-02 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically

Owner Information

MIR3, Inc.
New York , NY
MIR3, Inc.
San Diego , CA
MIR3, Inc.
San Diego , CA

Correspondent

Lisa C. Pavento Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC
999 Peachtree St. NE
Suite 1300
Atlanta, GA 30309

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-02-16
Status Date:
2022-07-29
Category:
Telecommunications
Filing Year:
2010

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.