Brandinium

Trademark search for:

INTERNET LOCALIZATION

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2012-02-22 — Application filed
  • 2012-02-25 — Application filed
  • 2012-02-29 — Application filed
  • 2012-04-26 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2012-05-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-05-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-05-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-11-01 — Office action issued
  • 2012-11-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-11-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-11-28 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2012-11-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-11-28 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-11-28 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-11-28 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2012-12-13 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-12-13 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-12-26 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2013-01-15 — Published for opposition
  • 2013-01-15 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2013-03-12 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2013-08-12 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2013-08-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2013-08-12 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2013-08-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2014-01-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2014-01-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2014-03-10 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2014-03-10 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2014-04-04 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2014-04-04 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2014-04-05 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2014-07-28 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2014-07-28 — Use amendment filed
  • 2014-08-03 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2014-09-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-09-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-09-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-03-14 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-03-14 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-03-14 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2015-03-14 — Su-examiner's amendment written
  • 2015-04-07 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2015-04-08 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2015-05-12 — Registered-principal register
  • 2015-06-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-06-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-07-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-03-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2018-03-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-12-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-05-12 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2021-06-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-06-14 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-06-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-06-14 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-06-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-06-14 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2021-11-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2021-11-19 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Level 3 Communications, LLC
MONROE , LA
Level 3 Communications, LLC
Broomfield , CO
Level 3 Communications, LLC
Broomfield , CO

Correspondent

Gretchen L. Testerman LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES
1025 Eldorado Boulevard
Intellectual Property Group
Broomfield, CO 80021

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-02-22
Status Date:
2021-11-19
Category:
Telecommunications
Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.