Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
2016 ›
MO ›
MOBAPI
Trademark search for:
MOBAPI
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-01-04 — Application filed
2016-03-03 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2016-03-10 — Application filed
2016-03-15 — Application filed
2016-04-20 — Assigned to examiner
2016-04-28 — Final disposition recorded
2016-04-29 — Office action issued
2016-04-29 — Office action issued
2016-04-29 — Office action issued
2016-05-19 — Office action issued
2016-10-21 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2016-10-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-10-21 — Office action issued
2016-10-21 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2016-11-01 — Assigned to lie
2016-11-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-11-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-01-04 — Office action issued
2017-01-04 — Office action issued
2017-01-04 — Office action issued
2017-08-04 — Application abandoned
2017-08-04 — Application abandoned
2017-08-04 — Final status recorded
2017-08-09 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2017-08-09 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2017-08-25 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2018-08-04 — Final disposition recorded
2018-08-06 — Final disposition recorded
2018-08-31 — Final disposition recorded
Owner Information
BITWIP
F-97354 REMIRE-MONTJOLY FR
Correspondent
Nicolas E. Seckel Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP 1250 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-01-04
Status Date:
2017-08-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.