Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Toys & Sporting Goods ›
1987 ›
BA ›
BACK SWING
Trademark search for:
BACK SWING
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-01-23 — Application filed
2008-01-28 — Application filed
2008-02-07 — Teas amendment entered before attorney assigned
2008-02-07 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2008-02-07 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2008-04-30 — Final disposition recorded
2008-04-30 — Final disposition recorded
2008-04-30 — Assigned to examiner
2008-04-30 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-09-29 — Office action issued
2008-09-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-10-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-10-28 — Assigned to lie
2008-10-28 — Law office publication review completed
2008-11-07 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2008-11-17 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2008-12-18 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-18 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-18 — Final disposition recorded
2009-05-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-05-13 — Office action issued
2009-05-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-06-03 — Office action issued
2009-06-03 — Office action issued
2009-06-03 — Office action issued
2009-07-13 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2009-07-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-07-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-07-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-07-29 — Assigned to lie
2009-07-30 — Law office publication review completed
2009-08-12 — Notice of publication
2009-09-01 — Published for opposition
2009-11-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-02-16 — Office action issued
2010-02-16 — Divisional request received
2010-03-29 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-03-30 — Divisional processing complete
2010-04-26 — Sou teas extension received
2010-04-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-04-27 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-04-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2010-11-19 — Sou teas extension received
2010-11-19 — Sou extension 2 filed
2010-11-22 — Sou extension 2 granted
2010-11-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-04-18 — Sou teas extension received
2011-04-18 — Sou extension 3 filed
2011-04-21 — Sou extension 3 granted
2011-04-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-11-17 — Sou teas extension received
2011-11-17 — Sou extension 4 filed
2011-11-25 — Sou extension 4 granted
2011-11-26 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-05-10 — Sou teas extension received
2012-05-10 — Sou extension 5 filed
2012-05-15 — Sou extension 5 granted
2012-05-16 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-10-01 — Teas petition to amend basis received
2012-10-15 — Assigned to petition staff
2012-10-16 — 44(e) petition - granted
2012-10-16 — Attorney review/decision on amendment required
2012-11-23 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2012-11-23 — Case returned to examination
2012-12-19 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-01-08 — Published for opposition
2013-01-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-03-26 — Registered-principal register
2017-05-31 — Cancellation instituted no. 999999
2017-08-22 — Cancellation granted no. 999999
2017-09-06 — Cancellation terminated no. 999999
2017-09-06 — Cancelled section 18-total
2017-09-06 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Primark Holdings
Dublin 1 IE
Primark Holdings
Dublin 1 IE
Primark Holdings
Dublin 1 IE
Correspondent
WILLIAM WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP 60 EAST 42ND STREET SUITE 2520 NEW YORK, NY 10165
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-01-23
Status Date:
2017-09-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.