Brandinium

Trademark search for:

POLYGONZO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2010-04-27 — Application filed
  • 2010-04-30 — Application filed
  • 2010-05-01 — Application filed
  • 2010-08-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-08-06 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2010-08-06 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2010-08-06 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2010-08-06 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2010-08-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-08-24 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-08-24 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-09-28 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-09-28 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-11-23 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2011-05-23 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2011-06-27 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-06-27 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-08-26 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2011-08-26 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2011-08-26 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2011-08-31 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-08-31 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2011-09-01 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-11-23 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2011-12-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-12-27 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-02-26 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2012-02-26 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2012-02-26 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2012-02-27 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2012-02-29 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2012-03-01 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-03-02 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2012-03-08 — Undeliverable mail - corresp. remailed
  • 2012-05-23 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2012-06-25 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-06-25 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-08-24 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2012-08-24 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2012-08-24 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2012-08-24 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2012-08-27 — Notice of revival - mailed
  • 2012-09-06 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2012-09-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-09-08 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2012-09-25 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
  • 2012-11-23 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2012-12-24 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-12-24 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-02-22 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2013-02-22 — Use amendment filed
  • 2013-02-22 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2013-02-22 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2013-02-22 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2013-02-22 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2013-02-25 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2013-02-25 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2013-02-25 — Notice of revival - mailed
  • 2013-02-25 — Notice of revival - mailed
  • 2013-02-26 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2013-02-27 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2013-03-29 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2013-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-11-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-11-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-11-04 — Final status recorded
  • 2013-11-22 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken

Owner Information

Royalty Pros Licensing, LLC
Ossining , NY
Royalty Pros Licensing, LLC
Ossining , NY

Correspondent

SANFORD B. FRANK LAW OFFICE OF SANFORD B. FRANK
151 KETTLES LN
MEDFORD, NY 11763-1558
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-04-27
Status Date:
2013-11-04
Filing Year:
1988

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.