Brandinium

Trademark search for:

COUNTDOWN POKER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1993-09-17 — Application filed
  • 1994-01-24 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1994-01-28 — Examiner's amendment mailed
  • 1994-02-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1994-04-08 — Notice of publication
  • 1994-05-10 — Published for opposition
  • 1994-08-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 1994-12-07 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 1994-12-07 — Use amendment filed
  • 1994-12-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1995-01-25 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 1995-01-25 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 1995-02-03 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 1995-05-09 — Registered-principal register
  • 2001-04-30 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 2001-07-03 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2005-05-05 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2005-05-05 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2005-07-01 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2005-07-01 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2005-07-01 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2014-08-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2014-08-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-09-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-09-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-10-19 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2015-12-15 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2015-12-16 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2015-12-16 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2015-12-16 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2016-12-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-12-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2018-05-21 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-05-21 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2022-10-20 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2022-10-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2022-10-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2022-10-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2022-10-20 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2023-03-10 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2023-03-10 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2023-03-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2023-11-15 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2024-01-29 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2024-01-29 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2024-01-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2024-01-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2024-01-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2024-01-29 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2024-05-09 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2025-11-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2025-11-21 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

EMPIRE TECHNOLOGICAL GROUP LIMITED
LAS VEGAS , NV
ARUZE GAMING AMERICA, INC.
LAS VEGAS , NV
Universal Distributing of Nevada, Inc.
Las Vegas , NV
Universal Distributing of Nevada, Inc.
Las Vegas , NV
Universal Distributing of Nevada, Inc.
Las Vegas , NV

Correspondent

Magdalena M. Fincham RowanTree Law Group, PLLC
90 Grove Street - Suite 205
Ridgefield, CT 06877
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1993-09-17
Status Date:
2025-11-21
Category:
Toys & Sporting Goods
Filing Year:
1993

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.