Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Toys & Sporting Goods ›
1994 ›
RE ›
REGIOTEK
Trademark search for:
REGIOTEK
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1994-12-12 — Application filed
1995-04-28 — Assigned to examiner
1995-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
1995-11-09 — Correspondence received in law office
1995-12-15 — Assigned to examiner
1995-12-18 — Letter of suspension mailed
1996-06-14 — Correspondence received in law office
1996-07-15 — Letter of suspension mailed
1996-07-30 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1996-09-05 — Correspondence received in law office
1996-10-07 — Letter of suspension mailed
1997-04-10 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1997-06-18 — Letter of suspension mailed
1997-12-15 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1998-02-26 — Letter of suspension mailed
1999-05-24 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1999-11-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-01-13 — Letter of suspension mailed
2001-03-30 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2001-05-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-11-06 — Letter of suspension mailed
2002-07-17 — Assigned to examiner
2002-08-14 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2002-10-10 — Paper received
2002-10-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-12-02 — Letter of suspension mailed
2002-12-23 — Paper received
2002-12-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-01-29 — Letter of suspension mailed
2003-07-28 — Letter of suspension mailed
2003-07-28 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2004-01-20 — Paper received
2004-01-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-02-06 — Case file in ticrs
2004-02-25 — Letter of suspension mailed
2004-08-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2004-09-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2005-04-08 — Suspension inquiry written
2005-04-11 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2005-06-27 — Paper received
2005-06-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-06-30 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-07-13 — Suspension letter written
2005-07-14 — Letter of suspension mailed
2006-02-01 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2006-02-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-02-07 — Paper received
2006-03-08 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2006-08-12 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2006-08-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-02-22 — Assigned to lie
2007-02-23 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2007-03-22 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-09-28 — Assigned to lie
2007-09-28 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-03-28 — Assigned to lie
2008-04-01 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2008-06-18 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-12-19 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2009-03-05 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-09-09 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2009-09-18 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-03-18 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-09-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2011-03-24 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2011-04-20 — Suspension inquiry written
2011-04-21 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2011-11-17 — Application abandoned
2011-11-17 — Application abandoned
2011-11-17 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
REGIOTEK, S.A. DE C.V.
NUEVO LEON MX
Correspondent
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB 666 3RD AVE 10TH FL NEW YORK, NY 10017 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1994-12-12
Status Date:
2011-11-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.