Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Toys & Sporting Goods ›
1996 ›
CA ›
CARBOMAX
Trademark search for:
CARBOMAX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1996-12-20 — Application filed
1997-05-27 — Assigned to examiner
1997-05-27 — Final disposition recorded
1997-08-27 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1997-09-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
1997-09-26 — Notice of publication
1997-10-28 — Published for opposition
1998-01-20 — Registered-principal register
2002-10-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-06-04 — Paper received
2003-06-04 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2003-08-08 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2007-04-12 — Case file in ticrs
2007-10-08 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2007-10-08 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2007-10-12 — Assigned to paralegal
2007-10-13 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2007-10-13 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2011-05-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
2013-07-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-01-20 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2018-05-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-10-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-10-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Shimano Inc.
Sakai Osaka 590-8577 JP
Shimano Inc.
Sakai Osaka 590-77 JP
Shimano Inc.
Sakai Osaka 590-77 JP
Correspondent
RICHARD C. GILMORE MASCHOFF BRENNAN LAYCOCK GILMORE ISRAELSEN & WRIGH 111 SOUTH MAIN STREET SUITE 600 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1996-12-20
Status Date:
2021-10-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.