Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Toys & Sporting Goods ›
1999 ›
EM ›
E MAX
Trademark search for:
E MAX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-03-30 — Application filed
2016-04-02 — Application filed
2016-04-04 — Application filed
2016-04-05 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2016-06-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-07-12 — Assigned to examiner
2016-07-20 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-07-20 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-07-20 — Examiners amendment -written
2016-07-20 — Examiner's amendment entered
2016-07-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-08-02 — Assigned to lie
2016-08-03 — Law office publication review completed
2016-08-17 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-09-06 — Published for opposition
2016-09-06 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-10-05 — Opposition papers received at ttab
2016-10-05 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2016-11-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2016-11-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2016-12-06 — Assigned to examiner
2017-11-29 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2017-11-29 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2017-11-29 — Application abandoned
2017-11-29 — Application abandoned
2017-11-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
YINYAN TECH US INC.
BREA , CA
YINYAN TECH US INC.
BREA , CA
Correspondent
DOUGLAS H MORSEBURG LEECH TISHMAN FUSCALDO & LAMPL LLP 633 W FIFTH STREET 48TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-03-30
Status Date:
2017-11-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.