Brandinium

Trademark search for:

AD HYBRID

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-11-12 — Application filed
  • 2004-11-17 — Application filed
  • 2005-06-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-06-21 — Priority action written
  • 2005-06-21 — Priority action written
  • 2005-06-21 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2005-06-21 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2005-08-04 — Paper received
  • 2005-10-19 — Paper received
  • 2005-10-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-10-28 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-10-28 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-11-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-12-07 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2005-12-20 — Withdrawn from pub - mpu request
  • 2005-12-22 — Letter of protest evidence forwarded
  • 2006-01-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-01-13 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2006-01-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-03-16 — Paper received
  • 2006-03-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-03-20 — Paper received
  • 2006-03-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-03-23 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-03-27 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-04-18 — Office action issued
  • 2006-04-18 — Office action issued
  • 2006-10-19 — Paper received
  • 2006-10-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-10-25 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2006-10-25 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-10-25 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2006-11-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-11-16 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2007-01-26 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2007-02-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-02-20 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2007-02-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2007-06-18 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2007-07-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-08-22 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-08-22 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-09-05 — Notice of publication
  • 2007-09-25 — Published for opposition
  • 2007-10-12 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2007-10-12 — Opposition papers received at ttab
  • 2008-06-25 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2009-01-21 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2009-02-02 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2009-02-02 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
  • 2009-02-02 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2009-03-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-03-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-03-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-04-14 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2009-04-14 — Use amendment filed
  • 2009-04-24 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-04-24 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2009-05-19 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2009-05-19 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2009-06-23 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-12-12 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2016-01-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2016-01-29 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

GRAPHITE DESIGN INC.
SAITAMA-KEN JP
GRAPHITE DESIGN INTERNATIONAL INC.
SAN DIEGO , CA
GRAPHITE DESIGN INTERNATIONAL INC.
SAN DIEGO , CA
SRI Sports Limited
Hyogo JP
SRI Sports Limited
Hyogo JP

Correspondent

Daniel L. Dawes Law Offices of Daniel L. Dawes
5200 Warner Ave. Ste. 106
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-11-12
Status Date:
2016-01-29
Category:
Toys & Sporting Goods
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.