Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ELECTRONIC QUARTERBACK

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-05-26 — Application filed
  • 2004-06-03 — Application filed
  • 2004-12-27 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-12-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-12-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-07-28 — Application abandoned
  • 2005-07-28 — Application abandoned
  • 2005-09-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2005-09-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2005-09-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-09-26 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2005-09-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-09-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2005-09-26 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2005-09-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-09-28 — Paper received
  • 2005-09-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2005-09-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-09-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-10-07 — Paper received
  • 2005-10-07 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-10-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-10-10 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-10-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2005-11-03 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-01-19 — Attorney review completed
  • 2006-04-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-10-15 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-02-02 — Paper received
  • 2007-02-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-03-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-03-02 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2007-03-02 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-03-05 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-04-04 — Notice of publication
  • 2007-04-12 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2007-04-12 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2007-04-24 — Published for opposition
  • 2007-07-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2007-08-24 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2007-08-24 — Use amendment filed
  • 2007-09-05 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2007-09-05 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2007-09-05 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2007-10-09 — Registered-principal register
  • 2008-02-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2010-06-23 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2010-07-07 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2013-10-20 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2013-10-20 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2013-10-22 — Teas section 7 request received
  • 2013-10-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-10-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-10-22 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2013-11-06 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2014-01-16 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 7
  • 2014-09-05 — Teas petition to director received
  • 2014-10-06 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2014-10-15 — Petition to director denied
  • 2014-10-28 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
  • 2014-10-28 — Application abandoned
  • 2015-11-24 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2015-11-24 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

COLECO HOLDINGS
CHICAGO , IL
COLECO ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
Chicago , IL
River West Brands LLC
Chicago , IL
River West Brands LLC
Chicago , IL
River West Brands LLC
Chicago , IL

Correspondent

COLECO HOLDINGS LLC
300 North LaSalle Drive, Suite 4925
Chicago, IL 60654
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-05-26
Status Date:
2015-11-24
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.