Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Toys & Sporting Goods ›
2004 ›
ME ›
MEZZ HYBRID
Trademark search for:
MEZZ HYBRID
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-05-27 — Application filed
2004-06-16 — Application filed
2004-12-29 — Assigned to examiner
2005-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
2005-01-04 — Final disposition recorded
2005-06-22 — Examiners amendment -written
2005-06-22 — Assigned to lie
2005-06-23 — Examiner's amendment entered
2005-06-23 — Examiners amendment mailed
2005-06-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-08-31 — Law office publication review completed
2005-10-19 — Notice of publication
2005-11-08 — Published for opposition
2006-01-31 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-06-06 — Paper received
2006-06-06 — Use amendment filed
2006-06-28 — Statement of use processing complete
2006-06-28 — Final disposition recorded
2006-06-29 — Final disposition recorded
2006-07-31 — Paper received
2006-07-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-08-14 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-08-30 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2006-09-12 — Assigned to lie
2006-09-15 — Law office registration review completed
2006-10-24 — Registered-principal register
2013-05-31 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2013-05-31 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
KABUSHIKI KAISHA MIKI
Gunma-ken 370-2343 JP
KABUSHIKI KAISHA MIKI
Gunma-ken 370-2343 JP
KABUSHIKI KAISHA MIKI
Gunma-ken 370-2343 JP
Correspondent
STEVEN M RABIN RABIN & BERDO PC STE 500,1101 14TH ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20005 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-05-27
Status Date:
2013-05-31
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.