Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Toys & Sporting Goods ›
2004 ›
NA ›
NANO SHELL
Trademark search for:
NANO SHELL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-04-30 — Application filed
2010-05-04 — Application filed
2010-05-05 — Application filed
2010-05-06 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2010-07-09 — Assigned to examiner
2010-07-16 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
2010-07-16 — Examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
2010-07-16 — Notification of examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
2011-01-13 — Examiners amendment -written
2011-01-13 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2011-01-13 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2011-01-13 — Examiner's amendment entered
2011-01-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-02-10 — Assigned to lie
2011-02-10 — Law office publication review completed
2011-03-15 — Published for opposition
2011-03-15 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-05-10 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-11-08 — Sou teas extension received
2011-11-08 — Sou extension 1 filed
2011-11-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
2011-11-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-06-11 — Application abandoned
2012-06-11 — Application abandoned
2012-06-11 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Crytek GmbH
Frankfurt am Main DE
Crytek GmbH
Frankfurt am Main DE
Correspondent
THOMAS W ADAMS RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP 1621 EUCLID AVE FL 19 CLEVELAND, OH 44115-2193 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-04-30
Status Date:
2012-06-11
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.