Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Toys & Sporting Goods ›
2005 ›
PE ›
PET-RIFFIC
Trademark search for:
PET-RIFFIC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-02-25 — Application filed
2005-03-05 — Application filed
2005-09-20 — Assigned to examiner
2005-09-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-09-23 — Assigned to lie
2005-09-26 — Law office publication review completed
2005-10-26 — Notice of publication
2005-11-15 — Published for opposition
2006-02-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-04-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-08-07 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-10-11 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2006-10-11 — Petition to revive-granted
2006-10-11 — Teas petition to revive received
2006-10-26 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-01-30 — Sou teas extension received
2007-01-30 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-01-30 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-08-07 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-09-14 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2007-09-14 — Petition to revive-granted
2007-09-14 — Teas petition to revive received
2007-10-04 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-01-23 — Sou teas extension received
2008-01-23 — Sou extension 4 filed
2008-02-12 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-08-08 — Final status recorded
2008-10-09 — Application abandoned
2008-10-09 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Roberts, Michael
St. Louis , MO
Roberts, Michael
St. Louis , MO
Correspondent
Sanford B. Frank Law Office of Sanford B. Frank 151 Kettles Lane Medford, NY 11763 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-02-25
Status Date:
2008-08-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.