Brandinium

Trademark search for:

THAT SPORTS GAME

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-11-16 — Application filed
  • 2005-11-22 — Application filed
  • 2006-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-05-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-11-21 — Office action issued
  • 2006-11-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-11-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-11-27 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2006-11-27 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-11-27 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-11-27 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2006-11-27 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2007-05-30 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2007-05-30 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-11-27 — Suspension letter written
  • 2007-11-27 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-11-27 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-05-27 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-05-27 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2008-06-02 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2008-06-02 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-06-02 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-11-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2008-11-25 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2008-11-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-11-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-12-01 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-12-01 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-12-01 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-06-02 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-06-04 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2009-06-04 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-06-04 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-11-24 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2009-11-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-11-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-12-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-12-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-12-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-03-03 — Teas request to divide received
  • 2010-03-03 — Divisional request received
  • 2010-04-06 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-04-06 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2010-04-27 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2010-04-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-04-27 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2010-04-27 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2010-04-27 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2010-04-27 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-06-01 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-06-01 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-08-17 — Registered-principal register
  • 2011-11-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-08-17 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2016-06-23 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2016-08-11 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2016-08-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2016-08-11 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2018-01-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2019-08-17 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2021-03-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2021-03-19 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Rhema Re-Creation, Ltd.
Regina, Saskatchewan CA
Rhema Re-Creation, Ltd.
McLennan, Alberta CA
Rhema Re-Creation, Ltd.
McLennan, Alberta CA

Correspondent

Erin J. Werner BUSHMAN WERNER, P.C.
1800 AUGUSTA, SUITE 220
HOUSTON, TX 77057
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-11-16
Status Date:
2021-03-19
Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.