Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Toys & Sporting Goods ›
2007 ›
MI ›
MIDBRID
Trademark search for:
MIDBRID
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-02-19 — Application filed
2007-02-23 — Application filed
2007-02-24 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2007-06-05 — Assigned to examiner
2007-06-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-07-12 — Assigned to lie
2007-07-12 — Law office publication review completed
2007-07-25 — Notice of publication
2007-08-14 — Published for opposition
2007-11-06 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-03-25 — Sou teas extension received
2008-03-25 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-03-25 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-08-25 — Sou teas extension received
2008-08-25 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-08-25 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-10-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-04-20 — Sou teas extension received
2009-04-20 — Sou extension 3 filed
2009-05-06 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-05-06 — Sou extension 3 granted
2009-06-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2009-06-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2009-11-05 — Sou teas extension received
2009-11-05 — Sou extension 4 filed
2009-11-09 — Sou extension 4 granted
2010-06-07 — Application abandoned
2010-06-07 — Application abandoned
2010-06-07 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Nike, Inc.
Beaverton , OR
Nike, Inc.
Beaverton , OR
Correspondent
Jaime M. Schwartz NIKE, INC. ONE BOWERMAN DRIVE, DF4 BEAVERTON, OR 97005 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-02-19
Status Date:
2010-06-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.