Trademark search for:

NAJA GOLF

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2009-08-04 — Application filed
2009-08-07 — Application filed
2009-08-07 — Application filed
2009-11-06 — Assigned to examiner
2009-11-16 — Final disposition recorded
2009-11-16 — Final disposition recorded
2009-11-16 — Final disposition recorded
2010-05-12 — Office action issued
2010-05-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-05-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-06-08 — Office action issued
2010-06-08 — Office action issued
2010-06-08 — Office action issued
2010-09-22 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2010-09-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-09-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-10-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-10-29 — Assigned to lie
2010-10-29 — Law office publication review completed
2010-12-07 — Published for opposition
2010-12-07 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-02-01 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-07-29 — Sou teas extension received
2011-07-29 — Sou extension 1 filed
2011-08-15 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-08-15 — Sou extension 1 granted
2011-08-16 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-03-05 — Application abandoned
2012-03-05 — Application abandoned
2012-03-05 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Chin-Lan Chang
Irvine , CA

Chin-Lan Chang
Irvine , CA

Correspondent

MARK FANG
215 E DAILY DR STE 9
CAMARILLO, CA 93010-5805
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-08-04

Status Date:
2012-03-05

Category:
Toys & Sporting Goods

Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.