Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Toys & Sporting Goods ›
2010 ›
IN ›
INFINITY REFORMER
Trademark search for:
INFINITY REFORMER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-07-15 — Application filed
2010-07-19 — Application filed
2010-07-21 — Application filed
2010-10-28 — Assigned to examiner
2010-10-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-11-12 — Assigned to lie
2010-11-12 — Law office publication review completed
2010-12-21 — Published for opposition
2010-12-21 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-02-15 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-07-15 — Sou teas extension received
2011-07-15 — Sou extension 1 filed
2011-07-15 — Sou extension 1 granted
2011-07-19 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-01-19 — Sou teas extension received
2012-01-19 — Sou extension 2 filed
2012-02-15 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-02-15 — Sou extension 2 granted
2012-02-16 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-08-03 — Sou teas extension received
2012-08-03 — Sou extension 3 filed
2012-08-06 — Sou extension 3 granted
2012-08-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-01-16 — Sou teas extension received
2013-01-16 — Sou extension 4 filed
2013-01-17 — Sou extension 4 granted
2013-01-18 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-09-16 — Application abandoned
2013-09-16 — Application abandoned
2013-09-16 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Balanced Body, Inc.
Balanced Body, Inc.
Correspondent
GORDON E. R. TROY, ESQ. GORDON E. R. TROY, PC
Filing Details
Filing Date:
Status Date:
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.
