Trademark search for:

DECADENT DOG

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2003-07-08 — Application filed
2004-01-14 — Assigned to examiner
2004-02-08 — Final disposition recorded
2004-02-26 — Paper received
2004-08-09 — Paper received
2004-08-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-08-25 — Paper received
2004-08-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-09-08 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-09-08 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-09-30 — Examiners amendment -written
2004-09-30 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2004-09-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-10-04 — Assigned to lie
2004-10-07 — Law office publication review completed
2004-12-20 — Paper received
2004-12-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-01-07 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-05-24 — Attorney review completed
2005-06-29 — Notice of publication
2005-07-19 — Published for opposition
2005-10-11 — Registered-principal register
2011-10-04 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2011-10-25 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-10-25 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2011-10-25 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - mailed
2016-05-13 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-05-13 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Nager, Robert
Needham , MA

Nager, Robert
Needham , MA

Nager, Robert
Needham , MA

Correspondent

DAVID WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS P.C.
600 ATLANTIC AVE
BOSTON, MA 02210-2206
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-07-08

Status Date:
2016-05-13

Category:
Transport & Storage

Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.