Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Transport & Storage ›
2003 ›
DI ›
DIAGO TILE
Trademark search for:
DIAGO TILE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-01-10 — Application filed
2003-05-13 — Paper received
2003-05-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-07-01 — Assigned to examiner
2003-07-08 — Case file in ticrs
2003-07-23 — Final disposition recorded
2004-01-23 — Paper received
2004-01-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-02-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-04-14 — Notice of publication
2004-05-04 — Published for opposition
2004-07-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-01-27 — Paper received
2005-01-27 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-03-02 — Sou extension 1 granted
2005-07-13 — Paper received
2005-07-13 — Sou extension 2 filed
2005-07-27 — Sou extension 2 granted
2005-12-23 — Paper received
2005-12-23 — Sou extension 3 filed
2006-01-23 — Sou extension 3 granted
2006-05-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2006-05-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2006-05-19 — Sou teas extension received
2006-05-19 — Sou extension 4 filed
2006-06-01 — Sou extension 4 granted
2007-01-28 — Final status recorded
2007-04-05 — Application abandoned
2007-04-05 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Ceramicas Diago, S.A.
12006 Castellon ES
Ceramicas Diago, S.A.
12006 Castellon ES
Correspondent
ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO P.O.BOX 9024163 SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-01-10
Status Date:
2007-01-28
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.