Brandinium

Trademark search for:

VISIT CALGARY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2010-09-27 — Application filed
  • 2010-09-30 — Application filed
  • 2010-09-30 — Application filed
  • 2011-01-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2011-01-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-01-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-01-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-05-16 — Office action issued
  • 2011-05-24 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-06-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-06-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-06-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-06-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-06-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-01-10 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2012-02-03 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2012-02-03 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-02-03 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-07-26 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-08-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-08-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-08-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-08-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-08-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-02-27 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2013-03-18 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2013-03-18 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-03-18 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-09-18 — Divisional request received
  • 2013-09-18 — Teas request to divide received
  • 2013-09-18 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2013-09-24 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2013-09-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-09-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-09-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2013-09-25 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2013-09-26 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2013-10-02 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2013-10-02 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2013-10-02 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2013-10-03 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2013-10-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2013-10-10 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2013-10-23 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2013-11-12 — Published for opposition
  • 2013-11-12 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2014-01-07 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2014-06-12 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2014-06-12 — Use amendment filed
  • 2014-06-23 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2014-06-28 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2014-07-02 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2014-07-03 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2014-08-05 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-08-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-08-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-08-31 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2019-08-05 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2021-03-12 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2021-03-12 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

TOURISM CALGARY - CALGARY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
CALGARY, ALBERTA CA
Calgary Hotel Association
Calgary AB CA
Calgary Hotel Association
Calgary AB CA
Calgary Hotel Association
Calgary AB CA

Correspondent

Constance Gall Rhebergen Bracewell LP
P.O. Box 61389
Houston, TX 77208-1389
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-09-27
Status Date:
2021-03-12
Filing Year:
2010

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.