Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SUPER PIZZA PAN

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2014-10-09 — Application filed
  • 2014-10-13 — Application filed
  • 2014-10-16 — Application filed
  • 2015-01-28 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2015-01-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-01-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-01-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-07-10 — Office action issued
  • 2015-07-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-07-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-07-13 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-07-13 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-07-13 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-09-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-09-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-09-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-02-05 — Assigned to lie
  • 2016-02-11 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2016-02-11 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-02-11 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-02-11 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2016-04-08 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2016-04-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-04-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-04-14 — Suspension letter written
  • 2016-04-14 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-04-14 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-10-25 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2016-10-25 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2016-10-25 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-10-25 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-11-01 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2016-11-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-11-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-11-08 — Suspension letter written
  • 2016-11-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-11-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-04-20 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2017-05-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2017-05-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2017-05-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2017-05-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2017-05-23 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2017-06-07 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2017-06-27 — Published for opposition
  • 2017-06-27 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2017-08-22 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2018-02-22 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2018-02-26 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
  • 2018-02-26 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2018-02-26 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2018-02-26 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2018-03-05 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2018-03-14 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2018-03-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2018-08-17 — Teas post publication amendment received
  • 2018-08-17 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2018-08-30 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2018-10-09 — Registered-principal register
  • 2023-10-09 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2025-04-25 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2025-04-25 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Super Pizza Pan Franchising Ltda
Guarulhos BR
Super Pizza Pan Franchising Ltda
Guarulhos BR
Super Pizza Pan Franchising Ltda
Guarulhos BR

Correspondent

John M. Murphy Arochi, Marroquín & Lindner, S.C.
5802 Bob Bullock (Loop 20)
Building C1-56YI
Laredo, TX 78041

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2014-10-09
Status Date:
2025-04-25
Filing Year:
2014

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.