Brandinium

Trademark search for:

VISCOMATIC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1986-03-17 — Application filed
  • 1986-05-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1986-07-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1986-10-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1986-12-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1986-12-24 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 1987-01-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1987-02-01 — Notice of publication
  • 1987-03-03 — Published for opposition
  • 1987-07-21 — Registered-principal register
  • 1992-10-20 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 1993-01-28 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2007-03-21 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2007-07-20 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2007-07-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2007-07-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2007-08-22 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2007-08-22 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2007-08-22 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2016-07-21 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2020-03-27 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2020-03-27 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

STEYR-DAIMLER-PUCH AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
KARNTNER RING AT
STEYR-DAIMLER-PUCH AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
KARNTNER RING AT
STEYR-DAIMLER-PUCH AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
KARNTNER RING AT

Correspondent

Gregory P. LaPointe Bachman & LaPointe, P.C.
900 Chapel Street
Suite 1201
New Haven, CT 06510

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1986-03-17
Status Date:
2020-03-27
Category:
Vehicles
Filing Year:
1986

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.