Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Vehicles ›
2000 ›
BR ›
BRADYNE
Trademark search for:
BRADYNE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-08-31 — Application filed
2001-02-21 — Final disposition recorded
2001-08-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-10-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-03-27 — Notice of publication
2002-04-16 — Published for opposition
2002-07-09 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2002-10-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2002-11-04 — Paper received
2002-12-11 — Sou teas extension received
2002-12-11 — Sou extension 1 filed
2002-12-11 — Sou extension 1 granted
2003-07-07 — Sou teas extension received
2003-07-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
2003-07-14 — Sou extension 2 granted
2003-11-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-01-08 — Sou teas extension received
2004-01-08 — Sou extension 3 filed
2004-02-02 — Sou extension 3 granted
2004-04-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-06-30 — Sou teas extension received
2004-06-30 — Sou extension 4 filed
2004-07-13 — Case file in ticrs
2004-07-29 — Sou extension 4 granted
2005-01-07 — Sou teas extension received
2005-01-07 — Sou extension 5 filed
2005-01-25 — Sou extension 5 granted
2005-07-10 — Final status recorded
2005-09-27 — Application abandoned
2005-09-28 — Application abandoned
2006-01-31 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
BRADY, JOSEPH M.
Molalla , OR
BRADY, JOSEPH M.
Molalla , OR
Correspondent
NEAL M COHEN VISTA IP LAW GROUP LLP 9TH FL 2040 MAIN ST IRVINE, CA 92614
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2000-08-31
Status Date:
2005-07-10
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.