Brandinium

Trademark search for:

L V LIFE CARE VEHICLES

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-12-13 — Application filed
  • 2005-01-05 — Application filed
  • 2005-07-18 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-07-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-07-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-01-23 — Paper received
  • 2006-01-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-02-10 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-02-24 — Office action issued
  • 2006-02-24 — Office action issued
  • 2006-08-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-08-29 — Paper received
  • 2006-08-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-09-01 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-09-02 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-09-02 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-03-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-07-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2007-07-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2007-09-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-09-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-03-04 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-03-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-08-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2008-09-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-03-05 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-03-05 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2009-03-05 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-07-21 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2009-07-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-07-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-07-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-07-24 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-07-24 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2009-08-11 — Withdrawn from pub - tqr/non-atty request
  • 2009-08-18 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2009-08-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-08-19 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-09-02 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-09-22 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-12-15 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-06-11 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-06-11 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-07-09 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-07-09 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-07-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-08-04 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2010-08-04 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2010-12-09 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-12-09 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2010-12-13 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2010-12-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-06-06 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-06-06 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2011-06-08 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2011-06-09 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-11-17 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-11-17 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2011-11-21 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2011-11-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-07-16 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-07-16 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-07-16 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

NISSAN JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa JP
NISSAN JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
YOKOHAMA-SHI. KANAGAWA-KEN JP

Correspondent

MICOL CECCHI NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
P.O. BOX 685001
FRANKLIN, TN 37068-5001
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-12-13
Status Date:
2012-07-16
Category:
Vehicles
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.