Trademark search for:

SENTAIDA

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2013-02-04 — Application filed
2013-02-07 — Application filed
2013-02-08 — Application filed
2013-05-16 — Assigned to examiner
2013-05-18 — Priority action written
2013-05-18 — Priority action e-mailed
2013-05-18 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
2013-11-18 — Office action issued
2013-11-19 — Assigned to lie
2013-11-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-11-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-12-17 — Examiners amendment -written
2013-12-17 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2013-12-17 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2013-12-17 — Examiner's amendment entered
2013-12-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-12-24 — Law office publication review completed
2014-01-08 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2014-01-28 — Published for opposition
2014-01-28 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-04-15 — Registered-principal register
2016-05-04 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2019-04-15 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2020-11-20 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2020-11-20 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

QINGDAO SENTURY TIRE CO., LTD.
SHANDONG PROVINCE, CN

Sentaida Group
Qingdao CN

Sentaida Group
Qingdao CN

Sentaida Group
Qingdao CN

Correspondent

LINDSAY J. HULLEY RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
611 ANTON BLVD STE 1400
COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1931
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2013-02-04

Status Date:
2020-11-20

Category:
Vehicles

Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.