Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Vehicles ›
2008 ›
VE ›
VELOWAY
Trademark search for:
VELOWAY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-06-04 — Application filed
2008-06-09 — Application filed
2008-06-10 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-09-15 — Assigned to examiner
2008-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-03-13 — Office action issued
2009-03-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-03-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-03-16 — Examiners amendment -written
2009-03-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-03-16 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-03-16 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-03-16 — Examiner's amendment entered
2009-03-16 — Assigned to lie
2009-03-16 — Law office publication review completed
2009-04-01 — Notice of publication
2009-04-21 — Published for opposition
2009-07-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-01-12 — Sou teas extension received
2010-01-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-02-16 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-02-16 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-08-16 — Application abandoned
2010-08-16 — Application abandoned
2010-08-16 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Veloway
Nanterre FR
Veloway
Nanterre FR
Correspondent
Carole F. Barrett HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RAB 3 EMBARCADERO CTR, FL 7 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4024 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-06-04
Status Date:
2010-08-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.