Brandinium

Trademark search for:

QUIET CLIP

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2014-04-16 — Application filed
  • 2014-04-19 — Application filed
  • 2014-04-30 — Application filed
  • 2014-07-28 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2014-07-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-07-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-07-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-11-12 — Suspension letter written
  • 2014-11-12 — Correspondence e-mailed
  • 2014-11-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-11-12 — Office action issued
  • 2014-11-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-06-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2015-06-05 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2015-06-12 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2015-06-12 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-06-12 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-12-11 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2015-12-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-12-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-12-16 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-12-16 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-12-16 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-06-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2016-06-22 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2016-06-24 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2016-06-24 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-06-24 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-12-16 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2017-01-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2017-01-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2017-01-19 — Suspension letter written
  • 2017-01-19 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-01-19 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-07-20 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2017-08-09 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2017-08-09 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-08-09 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2018-02-07 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2018-02-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-02-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-02-09 — Suspension letter written
  • 2018-02-09 — Suspension letter written
  • 2018-02-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2018-02-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2018-02-09 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2018-02-09 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2018-08-10 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2018-08-10 — Assigned to lie
  • 2018-09-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2018-09-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2019-02-28 — Assigned to lie
  • 2019-03-05 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2019-03-20 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2019-03-20 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2019-03-20 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2019-05-14 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2019-05-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2019-05-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2019-06-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-06-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-06-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2020-01-21 — Application abandoned
  • 2020-01-21 — Application abandoned
  • 2020-01-21 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Nucap Industries Inc.
Scarborough, Ontario CA

Correspondent

Sean D. Flaherty Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP
101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000
San Diego, CA 92101
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2014-04-16
Status Date:
2020-01-21
Category:
Vehicles
Filing Year:
2014

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.