Brandinium

Trademark search for:

WEILAI AUTO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2016-03-21 — Application filed
  • 2016-03-24 — Application filed
  • 2016-03-24 — Application filed
  • 2016-06-29 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2016-07-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-07-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-07-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-01-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-01-03 — Office action issued
  • 2017-01-24 — Assigned to lie
  • 2017-02-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2017-02-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2017-02-09 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2017-02-09 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2017-02-09 — Suspension letter written
  • 2017-02-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-02-09 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-02-09 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2017-02-09 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2017-05-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2017-05-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-08-16 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-08-16 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-08-16 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2017-10-18 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2018-02-16 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2018-02-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-02-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-02-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-02-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-02-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-06-20 — Office action issued
  • 2018-06-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-06-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-06-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2018-07-11 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2018-07-31 — Published for opposition
  • 2018-07-31 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2018-09-25 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2018-10-19 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2018-10-19 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2018-11-27 — Registered-principal register
  • 2019-06-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2019-06-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2019-09-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2019-09-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-12-15 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-12-15 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-12-15 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-12-15 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
  • 2020-12-15 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2020-12-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-06-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-06-09 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
  • 2021-06-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-06-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-06-09 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2023-11-27 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2025-06-06 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2025-06-06 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

NIO CO., LTD
SHANGHAI CN
NIO CO., LTD
SHANGHAI CN
NIO CO., LTD
SHANGHAI CN
NEXTEV CO., LTD
Shanghai CN

Correspondent

Heather A. Dunn, Esq. DLA Piper LLP (US)
555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94105-2933
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2016-03-21
Status Date:
2025-06-06
Category:
Vehicles
Filing Year:
2016

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.